⏰ EU Pay Transparency Directive — transposition deadline 7 June 2026

Software Comparison

Pay Equity Software Comparison 2026

An editorial comparison of pay equity software vendors covering the EU Pay Transparency Directive and US state pay transparency laws. No affiliate links, no sponsorships — purely fact-based.

Published 16 April 2026 · Last updated: April 2026

The EU Pay Transparency Directive (2023/970) and a growing patchwork of US state laws are driving rapid adoption of pay equity software. The market has expanded significantly since 2024, with specialised startups, compensation platforms and HRIS modules all competing for buyers. This comparison evaluates the most relevant vendors on features, target market and regulatory coverage.

Selection criteria for this comparison

All vendors must cover at least three core functions: statistical pay gap analysis, job architecture/equivalent-work grouping, and reporting

Assessment based on publicly available information, vendor documentation and market analysis

No affiliate links, no sponsored placements

As of April 2026

Feature comparison: core capabilities

Vendor Gap Analysis Job Architecture Reporting Simulation Monitoring HRIS Integration
PayAnalytics Multivariate regression Built-in module EU directive, IS, UK Yes Real-time dashboard Workday, SAP, API
Syndio Regression, intersectional Opportunity analysis US (EEOC, CA), EU Yes Continuous Workday, ADP, Oracle
Trusaic Regression, multi-factor Job grouping module US (CA SB 1162, EEOC), EU Yes Dashboard + alerts ADP, Workday, API
beqom Integrated in comp module Comp structures EU, country-specific Yes (Total Comp) Dashboard SAP, Workday, Oracle
Figures Benchmarking + gap Leveling framework FR Egapro, EU Comp planning Yes Personio, BambooHR, API
Gapsquare (XpertHR) Statistical, UK focus Job families UK GPG, EU directive Limited Dashboard CSV, API
Payscale Regression + market data Job matching US, UK, EU (basic) Yes Dashboard Workday, ADP, API
Salary.com CompAnalyst Pay Equity Job matching US-focused Yes Dashboard ADP, Workday, API
Carta Total Comp Equity + cash gap Leveling US (basic) Comp planning Limited Carta, HRIS via API
gradar Analytical job evaluation Built-in (DE) DE-focused No Limited CSV, API
Comp-n-Ben DACH-specific Tariff structures DE, AT, CH Limited Basic DATEV, SAP, Personio

Decision matrix by company size

Company Size Recommended Category Suitable Vendors Typical Cost/Year (USD)
100-500 employees Specialised SaaS PayAnalytics, Figures, Trusaic, Carta Total Comp $20,000-$45,000
500-2,000 employees Mid-market pay equity PayAnalytics, Syndio, Trusaic, Payscale, Salary.com $45,000-$100,000
2,000-10,000 employees Enterprise pay equity Syndio, beqom, Payscale, PayAnalytics $100,000-$250,000
10,000+ employees Enterprise suite with pay equity module beqom, Syndio, SAP SuccessFactors (partner) $250,000+

Directive requirement coverage

The following table shows how each vendor covers specific requirements of Directive 2023/970. Ratings are based on publicly available product information and may change with product updates.

Requirement (Directive 2023/970) PayAnalytics Syndio Trusaic beqom Figures Payscale Salary.com
Gender pay gap report (Art. 9) Yes Partial Partial Yes Yes Partial No
Equivalent work / comparator groups (Art. 4) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
5% threshold / joint pay assessment (Art. 10) Yes Yes Partial Yes Partial Partial No
Information request workflow (Art. 7) Yes No No Yes No No No
GDPR-compliant processing in EU Yes (IS/EU) US-based US-based Yes (CH/EU) Yes (FR/EU) US-based US-based
Pay range in job postings (Art. 5) Partial No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
US pay data reports (EEOC, CA SB 1162) No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes

Vendor profiles

PayAnalytics (Reykjavik, Iceland) is the vendor most tightly aligned with the EU directive. Founded in 2017, it focuses exclusively on pay equity. The platform provides multivariate regression, a built-in job architecture module and reporting templates for multiple EU countries. Strength: EU-native, GDPR-compliant, strong methodology. Weakness: smaller ecosystem than US vendors.

Syndio (Seattle, USA) is the largest specialised pay equity vendor globally. The platform combines pay gap analysis with opportunity analytics (promotions, hiring) and intersectional analysis by gender, race and ethnicity. Strength: comprehensive analytics, large enterprise reference customers. Weakness: US-centric, EU reporting still developing, data processed in the US.

Trusaic (Los Angeles, USA) specialises in pay equity compliance with a strong focus on US state laws, particularly California SB 1162. The platform automates pay data reports and provides regression-based analysis. Strength: US regulatory compliance, automated California reporting. Weakness: EU features still building, US-based data processing.

beqom (Nyon, Switzerland) offers a comprehensive total compensation platform with integrated pay equity analytics. Best suited for large enterprises that want pay equity as part of a broader compensation strategy. Strength: holistic approach, EU data residency. Weakness: high complexity and cost.

Figures (Paris, France) combines compensation benchmarking with pay equity analysis. It generates the French Index Egapro and is expanding to cover the full EU directive. Strength: strong benchmarking, EU-native. Weakness: pay equity depth less than pure specialists.

Salary.com (Waltham, USA) offers CompAnalyst Pay Equity as part of its broader compensation management suite. Strong market data integration. Strength: large compensation database, established brand. Weakness: EU-specific features limited, US-focused.

Carta Total Comp (San Francisco, USA) extends Carta's equity management platform into total compensation and pay equity. Best suited for venture-backed companies already using Carta for cap table management. Strength: equity + cash analysis, startup-friendly. Weakness: limited EU coverage, basic reporting.

Recommended approach

Shortlist 2-3 vendors based on company size, HRIS landscape and jurisdictional scope

Run a pilot on representative data — data quality determines success, not feature lists

Verify EU directive coverage: report formats, information-request workflows, 5% threshold alerts

Confirm data residency: EU employee data should be processed in the EU under GDPR

For US+EU employers: ensure the platform handles both EU gender gap reports and US intersectional analysis

Frequently asked questions

Which pay equity software works best for EU compliance?

PayAnalytics offers the strongest alignment with Directive 2023/970, including EU-specific reporting and GDPR-compliant processing. beqom provides a comprehensive total compensation platform with EU data residency. Figures combines benchmarking with EU gap reporting. For multinational EU+US operations, Syndio and Trusaic cover both regimes from a single platform.

How much does pay equity software cost?

SaaS solutions for mid-market employers (200-1,000 employees) typically range from USD 20,000 to USD 75,000 per year. Enterprise solutions for 5,000+ employees can exceed USD 150,000 annually. Implementation costs add 30-50% of the first-year licence fee. Some vendors offer per-employee pricing from USD 3-8 per employee per month.

Can one platform cover both EU and US pay equity requirements?

Yes. Syndio, Trusaic and Payscale handle both EU directive reporting and US requirements (EEOC, California SB 1162). The platform must run EU gender-only regression per equivalent-work group alongside US intersectional analysis. EU employee data should be processed in the EU under GDPR.